ACTION ALERT! Stop Mental Screening & Federal Curriculum for PreK
This is an alert that was forwarded to me and I thought was worth passing on. I know that many homeschooling families with young children have expressed concern over the Universal Preschool bill.
ACTION ITEM!
This Action Item from EdWatch was forwarded by Monica Boyer from Families United Against Government Mental Screening. It is in response to the Head Start Reauthorization bill H.R. 1429 that we’ve been discussing on the UniversalPreschool.com e-list this week. EdWatch has organized this ACTION — we need your help now to protect our young children…
Tuesday November 13, 2007
Mental Screening & Federal Curriculum for Preschoolers
H.R. 1429: Urge a NO Vote This WeekIs social-emotional (mental health) screening of very young children the purpose of Head Start? Re-authorization of the federal Head Start program, H.R. 1429, includes ongoing assessments of children. Very young children will be continually screened and assessed based on the radical ideas of the National Association for the Education of Young Children http://www.edwatch. org/updates07/ 033007-NAEYC. htm . Psychological screening of young children http://www.edaction .org/2005/ 112305-imha.htm increases the psychiatric labeling and drugging of children with ineffective and dangerous medications. This strategy will not eliminate poverty or raise academic achievement.
H.R. 1429 requires Head Start curricula and assessments that include gender issues, diversity, multiculturalism, mental health, environmentalism, and careers for very young children. Federal bureaucrats will be setting childhood norms in controversial areas for our nation’s very young children. These required “outcomes” constitute a federal, centralized curriculum for preschoolers.
PARENTAL CONSENT FOR MENTAL SCREENING STRIPPED FROM BILL
Last May 1, EdWatch Action issued an Action Alert http://www.edaction .org/2007/ 050107-fcpsa. htm to oppose the Head Start re-authorization that the House was about pass (see roll call vote http://www.edaction .org/2007/ 050207-fcpsva. htm ). The House version, however, included a positive amendment that required parental consent for mental screening of preschoolers. On June 19th, the Senate passed the bill without the parental consent requirement.The Parental Consent language was stripped from the bill and passed out of the House/Senate conference committee last week. In other words, parental oversight of the mental and behavioral screening of preschoolers has been deliberately removed from Head Start.
Diagnostic criteria for mental disorders are extremely vague and subjective, as admitted by the US Surgeon General, the World Health Organization, and many psychiatric textbook authors. They are very difficult to accurately apply to young children. As a result of the New Freedom Commission recommendations for screening and drugging, this emphasis on mental health for very young children will result in increased screening and psychiatric drugging of infants and toddlers with drugs admitted to be ineffective and dangerous for children. (See here http://edaction. org/2005/ 021405.htm for details)
ACTION
Contact your members of Congress.Find your US Senators Phone Number HERE! http://www.senate. gov/general/ contact_informat ion/senators_ cfm.cfm
Find your House Member Phone Number HERE! http://clerk. house.gov/ member_info/ index.html Or call 202-225-3121 to be connected.
(Who are my Senators? http://www.senate. gov/ )
(Who is my House Member? http://www.house. gov/house/ MemberWWW_ by_State. shtml )Please tell your members of Congress to VOTE NO on H.R. 1429. Tell them:
* 1) H.R. 1429 continues the role of government in the mental health of very young children and their families.
* 2) H.R. 1429 implements radical curriculum standards for preschoolers in every state.
* 3) H.R. 1429 extends No Child Left Behind standards and testing to preschoolers. (See May 1, 2007 Alert http://www.edaction .org/2007/ 050107-fcpsa. htm .)
* 4) H.R. 1429 extends curriculum standards to all children via state and local integration.Language that was stripped from H.R. 1429 in conference committee:SEC. 645B. PARENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES.
(b) Requirement- Before administering any health care service to a child (or referring a child to obtain such service) in connection with participation in a program under this subchapter, a Head Start agency and an entity that receives assistance under section 645A shall obtain the written consent of a parent of such child indicating consent for each specific health care service to be performed.
preschool, universal preschool, Head Start, mental health screening

November 16th, 2007 at 1:11 pm
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
November 17th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
As Pete says…its like they’re trying to make sure that children are unbonded to their parents and ready to be drones from the moment they come out of the womb. This gets scarier and scarier from the laws being passed on birthing, to schooling, to vaxing. Scary scary…
November 17th, 2007 at 3:35 pm
I was just saying the same thing today! It’s as if they don’t want parents to actually parent their children, instead just hand them over to the state.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
There is a psychiatric / pharmaceutical plan to “suicide screen” every
child in the United States before they graduate from high school.
Evidence exists that shows massive pharmaceutical backing that will
result in even more overdrugging of kids with psychiatric drugs .
Can you take a moment to view this very short video? Click here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfU9puZQKBY
And then sign and forward this petition
http://www.petitiononline.com/TScreen/petition.html to your associates
and everyone you know? It already has over 23,000 signatures.
December 14th, 2007 at 1:53 pm
This is the most insane post I have ever seen. I work for a Head Start program. Children are not recieving psychological screenings. Families are answering questionnaires identifiyng stressors in their lives so they can be connected with resources. Head Start programs cannot give labels, diagnosises or medication.
Also the information about the National Association for the Education of Young Children Anti-Bias Curriculum has been so greatly misused. First of all Head Start Centers are not required to be certifed under NAEYC as stated. Second, the text listed is so grossly taken out of context.
Has anyone on this blog ever even been in or worked for Head Start? Head Start’s position is to help parents improve their parenting skills and strength the parent child bond. The truth is that there are a lot of children and families who are in need of education and parental support. I encourage you to visit a Head Start program to have a better understanding of the services they provide.
November 11th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I agree that the program is designed for children and families, but what is lacking is the way the program is executed. I do work for Head Start and I’m only speaking for the area I work in. No, there are no psychiatric evaluations or medication given!! But, the program cripples a lot of students because there is no structure. Parents bring the kids to school whenever they want, the behavorial problems are ridiculous. There are students that suffer in the classroom as well as the teacher because “the gov’t” don’t want to kick a child out of school. Well, the program is federally funded, but the children have to transition to a state funded program. When they get to kindergarten, the kids don’t have a clue, because they are not prepared for math, reading…for the past 2 years they have focused on play and social skills, something that should be taught at home! A majority of 5 year olds leaving Head Start can’t even sing the ABC song. We should focus on the child learning and get rid of a lot of the paper work.
I’m only a teacher assistant for 4 year olds, but every chance I get… I implement learning material that will prepare them for there future. And I encourage parents to be an example and I give them scenerios to let them know that in kindergarten, the state has no problem in keeping your child back or kicking them out of school for exessive absences and tardies.